April 3, 2008 by Tom Armstrong.

I’ve changed domains. My new address: Here.

Posted in General post | 1 Comment »

April 3, 2008 by Tom Armstrong.

From this excellent opinion in today’s WSJ:

By last week, Mrs. Clinton was in full Ghostbusters mode, claiming that John McCain’s speech on the housing problem “sounds remarkably like Herbert Hoover, and I don’t think that’s good economic policy.”

No, Senator, it surely isn’t. Around our offices, we’re still recovering from the fact that Hoover was the last Presidential candidate we’ve endorsed. We’ve been trashing Hoovernomics ever since. The issue this year, however, is who is really pursuing the Hoover model.

To hear Mr. Schumer and his fellow-traveling columnists tell it, Hoover’s great policy blunder was to do nothing, all the while insisting that everything was fine. But the problem with Hoover’s economic policy isn’t that it was passive but that it was actively destructive.

In 1930, he signed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, setting off a wave of protectionist retaliation that undid the globalization of the preceding decades and did far more harm to the world economy than the stock-market crash ever did. Two years later, amid a bad recession, he undid the Calvin Coolidge-Andrew Mellon tax cuts, raising the top marginal income-tax rate to 63% from 25%. The recession became a Depression.

Now, since we’re talking Hoover, which Presidential candidate has a similar agenda of protectionism and tax increases? Hmmm.

Oh, that’s right. Just the other day, one of the candidates for President was saying she’d withdraw from Nafta if the Mexicans didn’t do what she demanded, and she wants “a pause” in free trade. She also wants to repeal the Bush tax cuts, more than doubling the rate on dividends back to 39.6% from 15%.

Her Democratic opponent agrees with her, except that he’d raise taxes even more, including by eliminating the $102,000 cap on income subject to the 6.2% payroll tax (12.4% when you include employers), and raising the capital gains tax to at least 25%, and maybe even 28%, from 15%. Add up all of Barack Obama’s tax increases and his proposals would get entirely too close to Hoover’s top marginal rate of 63%.

Maybe we should be afraid of Hoover’s ghost.

This is also an excellent article in today’s WSJ. Outtake:

In sum, Mr. Frank is volunteering U.S. taxpayers to insure $300 billion in mortgages with underwriting standards to be named later. Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd thinks $400 billion is more like it. Quavering Republicans should do the political math. The Mortgage Bankers Association tracks 46 million mortgage borrowers, and 42 million are paying on time. More than 20 million households own their homes outright and, having worked for years to pay for them, probably don’t want to pay for someone else’s. Neither do 35 million renters who didn’t take a flyer on nicer digs.

Posted in General post | 1 Comment »

April 3, 2008 by Tom Armstrong.

Take this quiz (15 questions) on general knowledge that I give my students at the beginning of each semester to find out. 70% is passing. Incidentally, the average score of my students at the beginning of the year is around 30 to 40%. Oh yeah, my picture on the test is just meant to reinforce to my students that I am always watching over them–and it might also have something to do with my super-massive ego.

Posted in General post | No Comments »

April 3, 2008 by Tom Armstrong.

Hurricane season is just around the corner, so Americans should know where to turn to if disaster strikes.

It’s not the Federal Emergency Management Agency. A new study suggests Wal-Mart, Home Depot and Lowe’s would be a lot more helpful.

The study, by Steven Horwitz, a professor of economics at St. Lawrence University in Canton, N.Y., stresses that successful disaster relief depends upon responders having detailed knowledge of a local area and the right incentives to act on that knowledge.

Examining federal and private responses to Hurricane Katrina, the study says why FEMA was destined to fail and why for-profit companies succeeded at disaster recovery.

Read it all here.

Posted in General post | No Comments »