You are currently browsing the Armchair Economist weblog archives for the day November 4, 2007.
- General post (802)
- April 3, 2008: Armchair Economist gets a much-needed update
- April 3, 2008: Ghost of Herbert Hoover
- April 3, 2008: Are you smarter than a high-schooler?
- April 3, 2008: Katrina hero: Wal-Mart
- April 2, 2008: No Child Left Behind
- April 2, 2008: The poverty hype
- April 2, 2008: Oil profits
- April 2, 2008: Don's response
- April 2, 2008: Oil refinements
- April 1, 2008: My profile
Archive for November 4, 2007
Friedman speaks
November 4, 2007 by Tom Armstrong.
In this excerpt from an interview with Phil Donahue in 1979, Friedman discusses greed and capitalism.
Posted in General post | No Comments »
Understanding meetings
November 4, 2007 by Tom Armstrong.
Alex at Marginal Revolution explains meetings:
Meetings are not always about the efficient exchange of information, or discovering a new idea. Meetings can be about displays of power, signaling that a coalition is in place, wearing down an opponent, staging “theater” to make someone feel better, giving key players the feeling of being insiders, transmitting information about status, or simply marking time until something better happens. It’s one thing to hate meetings. But before you can improve them, make sure you know what meetings are all about.
Posted in General post | No Comments »
Mankiw takes on healthcare
November 4, 2007 by Tom Armstrong.
Mankiw, writing in the NY Times, takes on the subject of healthcare. Although his arguments are nothing new, he does a good job summarizing several arguments. His argument is divided into three parts; here’s his 2nd argument:
STATEMENT 2 Some 47 million Americans do not have health insurance.
This number from the Census Bureau is often cited as evidence that the health system is failing for many American families. Yet by masking tremendous heterogeneity in personal circumstances, the figure exaggerates the magnitude of the problem.
To start with, the 47 million includes about 10 million residents who are not American citizens. Many are illegal immigrants. Even if we had national health insurance, they would probably not be covered.
The number also fails to take full account of Medicaid, the government’s health program for the poor. For instance, it counts millions of the poor who are eligible for Medicaid but have not yet applied. These individuals, who are healthier, on average, than those who are enrolled, could always apply if they ever needed significant medical care. They are uninsured in name only.
The 47 million also includes many who could buy insurance but haven’t. The Census Bureau reports that 18 million of the uninsured have annual household income of more than $50,000, which puts them in the top half of the income distribution. About a quarter of the uninsured have been offered employer-provided insurance but declined coverage.
Of course, millions of Americans have trouble getting health insurance. But they number far less than 47 million, and they make up only a few percent of the population of 300 million.
Any reform should carefully focus on this group to avoid disrupting the vast majority for whom the system is working. We do not nationalize an industry simply because a small percentage of the work force is unemployed. Similarly, we should be wary of sweeping reforms of our health system if they are motivated by the fact that a small percentage of the population is uninsured.
Posted in General post | No Comments »
NBER Digest
November 4, 2007 by Tom Armstrong.
The NBER Digest for November is here.
Posted in General post | No Comments »
Income differences
November 4, 2007 by Tom Armstrong.
Don B. of Cafe Hayek writes another good letter, which you can read here under his Nov. 4, 2007 post.
Posted in General post | No Comments »