You are currently browsing the Armchair Economist weblog archives for the day September 11, 2007.
- General post (802)
- April 3, 2008: Armchair Economist gets a much-needed update
- April 3, 2008: Ghost of Herbert Hoover
- April 3, 2008: Are you smarter than a high-schooler?
- April 3, 2008: Katrina hero: Wal-Mart
- April 2, 2008: No Child Left Behind
- April 2, 2008: The poverty hype
- April 2, 2008: Oil profits
- April 2, 2008: Don's response
- April 2, 2008: Oil refinements
- April 1, 2008: My profile
Archive for September 11, 2007
Hillary, Free Trader?
September 11, 2007 by Tom Armstrong.
Don Boudreaux responds to the Washington Post description of Hillary Clinton as “a dedicated free-trader.” His responds appears below.
Dear Editor:
In February Sen. Hillary Clinton openly worried about, as she put it, “exposure of our economy to economic developments in countries like China.” She also voted against fast-track trade-negotiation authority for the President, as well as voted against CAFTA. And you report today that Ms. Clinton “told students in New Hampshire that she hated ’seeing U.S. telemarketing jobs done in remote locations far, far from our shores’” (”Unions Press Clinton on Outsourcing Of U.S. Jobs,” Sept. 8).
So I dispute your description of Ms. Clinton as “a dedicated free-trader.” Sure, on certain occasions she vows allegiance to the principle. But when seeking the political affections of desirable protectionists, she’s happy to be partner to at least the subtler trade-restricting positions (if not yet the full-thrust positions that are the fetish of protectomanics such as Lou Dobbs).
Calling Hillary Clinton “a dedicated free-trader” is akin to calling Bill Clinton “a dedicated husband.”
Posted in General post | 1 Comment »