You are currently browsing the Armchair Economist weblog archives for the day September 7, 2007.
- General post (802)
- April 3, 2008: Armchair Economist gets a much-needed update
- April 3, 2008: Ghost of Herbert Hoover
- April 3, 2008: Are you smarter than a high-schooler?
- April 3, 2008: Katrina hero: Wal-Mart
- April 2, 2008: No Child Left Behind
- April 2, 2008: The poverty hype
- April 2, 2008: Oil profits
- April 2, 2008: Don's response
- April 2, 2008: Oil refinements
- April 1, 2008: My profile
Archive for September 7, 2007
Romney’s tax cut proposal
September 7, 2007 by Tom Armstrong.
Mitt Romney is set to propose eliminating taxes on most investment earnings for families that make under $200,000 a year, the first in what his campaign says will be a series of announcements throughout the fall on the specifics of his tax policy.
If cutting taxes on savings and investment is a positive for those earning under $200,000, why not encourage savings and investment for all, particularly those with the greatest marginal propensities to save and invest.
Posted in General post | 1 Comment »
Elasticity and Smuggling
September 7, 2007 by Tom Armstrong.
Notable from today’s WSJ:
New Jersey citizens have long thought their politicians were smoking something, and now they know for sure. Read on for a lesson in vice, taxes and diminishing returns.
Cigarettes have become every pol’s favorite tax target, and last year Trenton raised its cigarette tax to $2.575 per pack — the highest state levy in the nation. Governor Jon Corzine forecast that the tax increase of 17.5 cents a pack would fetch $30 million in revenue to help balance the state’s $1 billion deficit. Not quite. A new analysis by the Center for Policy Research of New Jersey finds that the state collected $23 million less revenue from tobacco taxes in Fiscal 2007 than it did the year before.
Anti-smoking and health advocates say this proves that high taxes on cigarettes reduce smoking. And they’re partly right: When you tax something, you get less of it. If only politicians kept that in mind when they were taxing work, investment and saving — as opposed to “sin.”
Posted in General post | 1 Comment »